minimoog.jpg
I just don't get it. Yes, I'm sure it's very clever what Moog have done and recreated perfectly a classic synth but when I see companies promoting it as "Minimoog Model D is a very inspiring instrument for the creative musician" then I must disagree. Sure, in 1971 it was probably just that and something amazing. Now, it's not. Even in the early 80s when I tried one I wasn't that impressed.
And the real kicker. It costs £3500! Who is going to spend that sort of money on a monophonic synth that is well past its sell-by date? I could kit out a whole studio of goodies for that and have far more creative fun. The Korg MS10 I owned in 1978 was more creative than a Minimoog.
And you have to feel a little sorry for those who have been sitting on their original ones for years and now seeing their price drop?
I just don't get it. Yes, I'm sure it's very clever what Moog have done and recreated perfectly a classic synth but when I see companies promoting it as "Minimoog Model D is a very inspiring instrument for the creative musician" then I must disagree. Sure, in 1971 it was probably just that and something amazing. Now, it's not. Even in the early 80s when I tried one I wasn't that impressed.
And the real kicker. It costs £3500! Who is going to spend that sort of money on a monophonic synth that is well past its sell-by date? I could kit out a whole studio of goodies for that and have far more creative fun. The Korg MS10 I owned in 1978 was more creative than a Minimoog.
And you have to feel a little sorry for those who have been sitting on their original ones for years and now seeing their price drop?
Comment